From aad15918520391ea0952d742db9c52c3ac2b1f7e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 16:31:46 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] xlib_libXv: correct license info The license is actually closer to ISC than MIT, E.G.: https://opensource.org/licenses/ISC vs https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT >From COPYING: Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above copyright notice appear in all copies and that both that copyright notice and this permission notice appear in supporting documentation, and that the names of Digital or MIT not be used in advertising or publicity pertaining to distribution of the software without specific, written prior permission. E.G. this is very similar to the normal ISC text which has been extended with a BSD-3c style advertisinc clause. Both are permissive licenses, but it is more correct to call it ISC-like. Notice: As pointed out by Rahul Bedarkar, this may actually be more closely related to the OpenBSD template license: http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/share/misc/license.template?rev=HEAD But that is also based on the ISC license, so calling it ISC-like is still correct. Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard --- package/x11r7/xlib_libXv/xlib_libXv.mk | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/package/x11r7/xlib_libXv/xlib_libXv.mk b/package/x11r7/xlib_libXv/xlib_libXv.mk index 26f8badc5c..0e02439fa8 100644 --- a/package/x11r7/xlib_libXv/xlib_libXv.mk +++ b/package/x11r7/xlib_libXv/xlib_libXv.mk @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ XLIB_LIBXV_VERSION = 1.0.11 XLIB_LIBXV_SOURCE = libXv-$(XLIB_LIBXV_VERSION).tar.bz2 XLIB_LIBXV_SITE = http://xorg.freedesktop.org/releases/individual/lib -XLIB_LIBXV_LICENSE = MIT +XLIB_LIBXV_LICENSE = ISC-like XLIB_LIBXV_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING XLIB_LIBXV_INSTALL_STAGING = YES XLIB_LIBXV_DEPENDENCIES = xlib_libX11 xlib_libXext xproto_videoproto xproto_xproto