manual: add notes about depending on a virtual package

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
This commit is contained in:
Yann E. MORIN 2014-04-05 17:21:47 +02:00 committed by Thomas Petazzoni
parent e92e0fd347
commit b245d469c6

View File

@ -91,3 +91,52 @@ provider, but only if it is selected.
Of course, do not forget to add the proper build and runtime dependencies for Of course, do not forget to add the proper build and runtime dependencies for
this package! this package!
Notes on depending on a virtual package
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
When adding a package that requires a certain +FEATURE+ provided by a virtual
package, you have to use +depends on BR2_PACKAGE_HAS_FEATURE+, like so:
---------------------------
config BR2_PACKAGE_HAS_FEATURE
bool
config BR2_PACKAGE_FOO
bool "foo"
depends on BR2_PACKAGE_HAS_FEATURE
---------------------------
Notes on depending on a specific provider
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
If your package really requires a specific provider, then you'll have to
make your package +depends on+ this provider; you can _not_ +select+ a
provider.
Let's take an example with two providers for a +FEATURE+:
---------------------------
config BR2_PACKAGE_HAS_FEATURE
bool
config BR2_PACKAGE_FOO
bool "foo"
select BR2_PACKAGE_HAS_FEATURE
config BR2_PACKAGE_BAR
bool "bar"
select BR2_PACKAGE_HAS_FEATURE
---------------------------
And you are adding a package that needs +FEATURE+ as provided by +foo+,
but not as provided by +bar+.
If you were to use +select BR2_PACKAGE_FOO+, then the user would still
be able to select +BR2_PACKAGE_BAR+ in the menuconfig. This would create
a configuration inconsistency, whereby two providers of the same +FEATURE+
would be enabled at once, one explicitly set by the user, the other
implicitly by your +select+.
Instead, you have to use +depends on BR2_PACKAGE_FOO+, which avoids any
implicit configuration inconsistency.